<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Attorney Articles &#8211; Barnes Alford Stork &amp; Johnson, LLP</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.basjlaw.com/category/attorney-articles/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.basjlaw.com</link>
	<description>Clients are our first priority</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2016 16:38:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>The Privity Rule: Anachronistic or Still Relevant?</title>
		<link>https://www.basjlaw.com/the-privity-rule-anachronistic-or-still-relevant/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matthew Gerrald]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Apr 2016 16:55:03 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Attorney Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Estate Planning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Matthew G. Gerrald]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.basjlaw.com/?p=829</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[On August 8, 1840, while delivering mail from the village of Hartford in England to the town of Holyhead in Wales, a gentleman named Winterbottom was ejected from his seat when the coach that he was driving broke down due<span class="ellipsis">&#8230;</span><div class="read-more"><a href="https://www.basjlaw.com/the-privity-rule-anachronistic-or-still-relevant/">Read more <span class="screen-reader-text">The Privity Rule: Anachronistic or Still Relevant?</span><span class="meta-nav"> &#8250;</span></a></div><!-- end of .read-more -->]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Personal or Collective: Division of the Duty to Defend</title>
		<link>https://www.basjlaw.com/personal-or-collective-division-of-the-duty-to-defend-2/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matthew Gerrald]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2015 16:41:25 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Attorney Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Construction Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Insurance Coverage & Litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Matthew G. Gerrald]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.basjlaw.com/?p=823</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Jurisdictions throughout the country have long debated whether insurers with duties to defend a common insured are obligated to pay only their pro rata share of defense costs and whether such insurers may seek contribution from one another for defense<span class="ellipsis">&#8230;</span><div class="read-more"><a href="https://www.basjlaw.com/personal-or-collective-division-of-the-duty-to-defend-2/">Read more <span class="screen-reader-text">Personal or Collective: Division of the Duty to Defend</span><span class="meta-nav"> &#8250;</span></a></div><!-- end of .read-more -->]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
